A-
follow
javascript:void(0)
A
follow
javascript:void(0)
A+
follow
javascript:void(0)
About J&K High Court
follow
#
History
follow
history.php
Committees
follow
commitees.php
Photo Gallery
follow
gallery.php
Organisational Chart
follow
../doc/upload/organization/hc.pdf
CJ & Sitting Judges
follow
cjjk.php
Former Chief Justices
follow
formercj.php
Former Judges
follow
formerJudges.php
High Court Registry
follow
hcregistry.php
Sections
follow
sections.php
Orders & Circulars
follow
#
Notifications
follow
notice.php
District Judiciary
follow
#
Courts
follow
subordinate.php
Judicial Officers
follow
biodatajo.php
Organisational Chart of Sub. Ordinate Judiciary
follow
../doc/upload/organization/dc.pdf
Status of Infrastructure in High Court & Subordinate Courts
follow
infra.php
eCourts Services Mobile App
follow
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=in.gov.ecourts.eCourtsServices
JustIS Mobile App (Android Version)
follow
../os/JustIS_New.apk
e-Court Softwares
follow
ecourt_application.php
e-Courts Awareness
follow
ecourt_aware.php
Webinars organized by J&K Judicial Academy
follow
webinar_sja.php
Useful Links
follow
usefullinks.php
×
follow
javascript:void(0)
History
follow
history.php
Committees
follow
commitees.php
Photo Gallery
follow
gallery.php
Organisational Chart
follow
../doc/upload/organization/hc.pdf
CJ & Sitting Judges
follow
cjjk.php
Former Chief Justices
follow
formercj.php
Former Judges
follow
formerJudges.php
High Court Registry
follow
hcregistry.php
Sections
follow
sections.php
Orders & Circulars
follow
#
Notifications
follow
notice.php
District Judiciary
follow
#
Courts
follow
subordinate.php
Judicial Officers
follow
biodatajo.php
Organization Chart of Sub. Ordinate Judiciary
follow
/doc/upload/organization/dc.pdf
Status of Infrastructure in High Court & Subordinate Courts
follow
infra.php
eCourts Services Mobile App
follow
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=in.gov.ecourts.eCourtsServices
JustIS Mobile App (Android Version)
follow
../os/JustIS_New.apk
e-Court Application
follow
ecourt_application.php
e-Courts Awareness
follow
ecourt_aware_m.php
Webinars organized by J&K Judicial Academy
follow
webinar_sja.php
Useful Links
follow
usefullinks.php
Judges" Roster
follow
#collapseOne
Current
follow
roster_curr.php
Archive
follow
roster_archi.php
Causelist
follow
#collapseTwo
Jammu
follow
causelistj.php
Srinagar
follow
causelistk.php
Case Status/Orders/Causelist
follow
#collapseThree
Jammu Wing
follow
https://services.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/index_highcourt.php?state_cd=12&dist_cd=1&stateNm=Jammu%20and%20Kashmir
Srinagar Wing
follow
https://services.ecourts.gov.in/ecourtindiaHC/index_highcourt.php?state_cd=12&dist_cd=1&court_code=2&stateNm=Jammu%20and%20Kashmir
Speeches & Articles
follow
sa.php
Publications
follow
sja.php
Court Notices
follow
courtnotices.php
Right To Information
follow
#collapseFive
High Court RTI Rules
follow
/doc/highcourt_rti_rules.pdf
Tenders
follow
#collapseSix
Current Tenders
follow
tenders.php
Old Archive
follow
oldtenders.php
Legal Aid
follow
#collapseSeven
About Legal Aid
follow
la.php
J&K Legal Services Authority
follow
http://www.jkslsa.gov.in/
List of PLV"s with Contact Numbers.
follow
/doc/List_of_PLVs_2020.pdf
Mediation
follow
#collapseEight
J&K High Court Mediation Committee
follow
mediationcomm.php
Juvenile Justice
follow
#collapseNine
J&K High Court Juvenile Justice Committee
follow
jjcomm.php
Juvenile Justice ACT
follow
doc/JJ act 2015.pdf
J&K Juvenile Justice Rules
follow
doc/jj_rules.pdf
District Wise Address of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) in J&K
follow
doc/add_jjb.pdf
High Court Library
follow
library.php
Advocates" Corner
follow
#collapseTen
List of Senior Advocates
follow
doc/senior_adv.pdf
Advocate List [Modified License No. for CIS]
follow
doc/Advocate-Enrol1.pdf
Format for Access to E-Diary
follow
doc/reg_form_ediary.pdf
Advocate List
follow
doc/Advocate List as on Sep. 2021.pdf
Advocate Enrollment Form
follow
doc/upload/notices/Applicationform.pdf
Criteria for Designating SeniorAdvocates, 2018
follow
doc/criteria_desig_sradv.pdf
Amendment to the Criteria for Designating SeniorAdvocates, 2018
follow
doc/Notification No. 846 dated 01.10.2019.PDF
REGARDING DESIGNATION OF SENIOR ADVOCATES
follow
doc/desig.PDF
Notification regarding Scheme for Internship and e-internship in the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir.
follow
doc/upload/notices/noti_23072020.PDF
Contact Details of Bar Members
follow
http://jkhighcourt.nic.in/advdetails.php
E-Court"s Project
follow
#collapseEleven
J&K High Court Information Technology Committee
follow
ecourtcomm.php
District Level Computer Committee
follow
dlcc.php
Central Project Coordinator (CPC)
follow
cpc.php
Nodal Officers Details
follow
/doc/upload/nodal.pdf
Downloads
follow
downloads.php
Acts, Rules,Orders,Guidelines & Protocols
follow
#collapseTwelve
THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR REORGANISATION ACT, 2019.
follow
doc/upload/notices/J&K Reorganisation act.pdf
CORRIGENDA(THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR REORGANISATION ACT, 2019)
follow
doc/upload/notices/corriganda.pdf
CENTRAL ACTS EXTENDED BY J&K Reorganisation Act 2019
follow
doc/upload/notices/CENTRAL ACTS EXTENDED BY J&K Reorganisation Act 2019.pdf
Protocol for recording evidence of vulnerable witnesses.
follow
doc/upload/notices/NOTIFICATION.pdf
Amendment to Jammu and Kashmir General Rules (Civil) framed under Section 122 of Civil Procedure Code.
follow
doc/upload/notices/noti_1617_07032019.pdf
Amendment to the Jammu and Kashmir General Rules(Criminal) framed under Section 554 of Criminal Procedure Code.
follow
doc/upload/notices/noti_1616_07032019.pdf
Amendment to the High Court Rules,1999
follow
doc/upload/notices/noti_1615_06032019.pdf
High Court Rules,1999
follow
hcrules.php
Writ Proceedings Rules, 1997
follow
gazette.php
J&K CSR,Volume-I
follow
doc/CSR VOL I.pdf
J&K CSR,Volume-II
follow
doc/CSR VOL II.pdf
J&K Civil Services Leave Rules,1979
follow
doc/J&K CIVIL SERVICES (LEAVE) RULES, 1979.pdf
J&K Govt.Employees Conduct Rules,1971
follow
doc/THE-JK-GOVERNMENT-EMPLOYEES-(CONDUCT)-RULES,-1971.pdf
THE JAMMU AND KASHMIRHIGH COURT STAFF (CONDITIONS OFSERVICE)RULES, 1968.
follow
doc/high court staff rules 1968.pdf
J&K Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956
follow
doc/JK-CIVIL-SEVICES-CLASSIFICATION-CONTROL-AND-APPEALpdf.pdf
THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGHER JUDICIAL SERVICERULES 2009
follow
doc/JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGHER JUDICJAL SERVICE.pdf
J&K Civil Services Judicial Recruitment Rules,1967
follow
doc/THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SERVICES (JUDICIAL) RECRUTIMENT RULES 1967.pdf
J&K Ministerial Staff of the Subordinate Courts (Recruitment & Conditions Of Services) Rules 2016
follow
doc/JAMMU AND KASHMIR MINISTERIAL STAFF OF THE SUBORDINATE COURTS(RECRUITMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICES) RULES 2016.pdf
Scheme / Guidelines for theappointment of Research Assistant to the Chief Justice / Judges in the High court of Jammu and Kashmir.
follow
http://jkhighcourt.nic.in/cir_old/rules.pdf
Amendment to the existing Scheme / Guidelines for theappointment of Research Assistant to the Chief Justice / Judges in the High court of Jammu and Kashmir.
follow
http://jkhighcourt.nic.in/doc/upload/notices/order44.pdf
Guidelines for Creches at High Court of J&K and Subordinate Courts of Union Territory of J&K and Union Territory of Ladakh.
follow
http://jkhighcourt.nic.in/doc/upload/notices/noti_971_18122019.pdf
Guidelines for the Conduct of Court Proceedings between Courts and Remote Sites and the VC facilities set up at other places.
follow
http://jkhighcourt.nic.in/doc/upload/notices/1282_11022020.pdf
Jammu and Kashmir Mediation and Conciliation Rules, 2019.
follow
http://jkhighcourt.nic.in/doc/upload/notices/noti_1542_10032020.pdf
e-Gazette
follow
#collapseThirteen
Govt of India Gazette
follow
http://egazette.nic.in
J&K Govt. Gazette
follow
http://rgp.jk.gov.in/gazette.html
Transfers & Postings
follow
#collapseFourteen
Judicial Officers
follow
jo.php
District Court Staff
follow
dcs.php
Status of Infrastructure
follow
#collapseFifteen
Status of Infrastructure in High Courts & Sub-ordinate Courts
follow
infra.php
Recruitment
follow
#collapseSixteen
Notifications
follow
noti.php
Apply Online
follow
http://jkhcrecruitment.in
Forms/ Proformas
follow
#collapseSeventeen
Format of Adjournment Memo
follow
doc/memo.pdf
Oath Commissioner Application
follow
doc/OATH COMMISSIONER APPLICATION.pdf
Property Statement Form
follow
doc/Property-Statement.pdf
Guidelines/ Form forrecording the ACRs of the Judicial Officers.
follow
doc/acr_guidlines.pdf
All About Courts
follow
#collapseEighteen
Letter regarding Opening of Courts during COVID-19 Period
follow
abc.php
Photo Gallery of Various High Courts, District Courts & Judicial Academy
follow
hc_p.php
Previous
follow
#carousel-example-generic
Next
follow
#carousel-example-generic
Display Board
follow
https://jkhc.gov.in/dis
N.J.D.G.
follow
http://njdg.ecourts.gov.in/njdgnew/index.php
Orders/Judgements
follow
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Virtual tour of High Court and District Court
follow
virtour.php
Read More..
follow
history.php
CRM(M) No.653/2019 Arshad Ahmad Allaie v. UT of J&K & Anr. Pronounced on: 06 July, 2021 Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir while deciding a petition whereby the petitioner had challenged an order granting extension of period of custody of accused beyond 180 days passed by a Sessions Court in terms of Section 36-A of NDPS Act and was claiming entitlement for default bail, ruled that where an accused is facing investigation for offences under UAPA together with offences under NDPS Act, concerned Sessions Judge under Section 36 of NDPS Act is vested with jurisdiction to extend the custody of such an accused beyond the period of 180 days subject to fulfilment of the conditions mentioned in proviso to sub-section (4) of Section 36A of NDPS Act. It was observed that jurisdiction to extend detention of an accused beyond the period of 90 days in relation to a case where the accused is booked for offences under UA(P) Act, which is included in the Schedule appended to NIA Act, vests with Special Court constituted in terms of provisions of NIA Act and Proviso to subsection (4) of Section 36-A gives jurisdiction to Special Court to extend the custody of a person who is accused of offences under NDPS Act beyond 180 days up to one yearon the report of the Public Prosecutor indicating progress of the investigation and the specific reasons for detention of the accused beyond said period of 180 days. Further observing that Section 36-D of the NDPS Act provides for a situation where Special Courts in terms of Section 36 of the NDPS Act have not been constituted, The Hon’ble Court pointed out there is high pendency of cases related to offences under NDPS Act in JK and in the absence of Special Courts, these cases are being tried by ordinary Sessions Courts thereby resulting in delay in disposal of these cases and the very object of the Act is getting defeated. The court expressed its anguish and dismay for the manner in which "the successive governments of erstwhile state of JK and now union territory of JK have dragged their feet on constitution and setting up of Special Courts in terms of Section 36 of NDPS Act in this part of the Country " and asked the government to take immediate steps for setting up of Special Courts for speedy disposal of cases related to offences under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (NDPS) 1985.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/crm_m_653_2019.pdf
Bail App No.253/2020 Sohan Singh v. Union Territory of J&K Decided on: 24 June, 2021 Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir while dismissing a Bail application observed that case where gravity of offence alleged against an accused is severe, the bail cannot be granted only on the ground of long incarceration. The Petitioner in this case was incarcerated since 31st December, 2012 for allegedly committing an offence under Section 302 of RPC. He was charged by the Trail Court in February 2014 and subsequent developments pertaining to impleadment of more persons as accused led to stay of Trial by the Supreme Court in December 2016. According to the petitioner, there has been unexplained and unreasonable delay in completion of the trial of the case, which entitles him to the grant of bail. The High Court opined that nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction has to be kept in mind before granting bail. Referring to case law case of Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan alias Pappu Yadav and another, (2004) 7 SCC 528, the Bench observed that the conditions laid down in Section 437(1)(i) of Cr. P. C are sine qua non for granting bail even under Section 439 of the Code, meaning thereby that in a case where a person is alleged to be involved in a offence punishable with death sentence or imprisonment for life, he cannot be released on bail if there appear reasonable grounds for believing that he has been guilty of such an offence. It was also observed that as per case law State of UP through CBI v. AmaramaniTripathi, (2005) 8 SCC 21, a detailed examination of the evidence is to be avoided while considering the question of bail, to ensure that there is no pre-judging and no prejudice. The Bench further held that: “It is true that some delay in completion of trial has taken place on account of restrictions in physical hearing of cases due to COVID-19 pandemic but that is an eventuality beyond the control of everybody. The same cannot be the sole ground for enlarging an accused on bail,particularly in a heinous offence like murder. Even otherwise, the Supreme Court in Kalyan Chandra Sarkar’s case (supra) has clearly laid down that in a case where gravity of offence alleged against an accused is severe, the bail cannot be granted only on the ground of long incarceration.”With these observations, the petition was dismissed.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/bail_253_2020.pdf
CrLA(D) No. 08/2020 Vishal Sharma v. Union Territory ofJammu and Kashmir through SHO P/SDomana and Anr. Pronounced on: 02 June, 2021 A Division Bench of Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir refused to suspend the sentence for the three convicts in the 2008 Deputy Advocate General Murder case and said it cannot overlook the fact that the accused-applicants have been held guilty and convicted for commission of a "heinous offence against the then serving Law Officer". The Hon’ble Bench referred to the judgement of the Apex court passed in case titled as “Preet Pal Singh Vs. State of UP” reported in 2020 (4) SCC 201 and reiterated that power of suspension of sentence by Appellate Court under Section 389 Cr.P.C confers "discretionary jurisdiction" and has to be "exercised sparingly". “A plain reading of Section 389 Cr.P.C, makes it is clear that the Section confers discretionary jurisdiction on Appellate court to suspend the execution of sentence during the pendency of the appeal on valid reasons recorded in writing. Law being settled that although the High court is not debarred from suspending the sentence and granting bail to a convict but that power has to be exercised sparingly while objectively assessing the matter and that too in the particular circumstances of each case.” It further noted that they were convicted after a full trial for about twelve 6 years by the Trial Court upon evaluation of ocular, circumstantial, medical and scientific evidence and were sentenced to life by a Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu in July 2020. The applicant-accused had also applied for bail on the premise that they have been under incarceration for the last more than 10 years and there is no possibility of adjudication/disposal of their respective appeals by the Court in near future. The Bench held that a conjoint reading of the applications in hand would reveal that in none of the said applications the applicants have spelt out any cogent ground giving rise to substantial doubt about the validity of the conviction, or that there is likelihood of unreasonable delay in disposal of their appeals. The applicants in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case were not held entitled to suspension of sentence and consequent grant of concession of bail during pendency of their respective appeals and as such, applications were dismissed.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/crla_d_8_2020.pdf
CM(M)No.1/2021 Amar Nath and Another v. Darshana Kumari & ors. Decided on: 04 June, 2021 In a petition invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu & Kashmir Court vested in terms of Article 227 of the Constitution, the petitioner sought quashment of the proceedings initiated by the Trial Court on a suit filed by respondents aggrieved of the fact that the same is third suit in succession filed by the respondent No.1 to 3 on same cause of action and that he has raised the plea of non-maintainability of the suit and sought rejection of the plaint in terms of Order VII Rule 11 CPC but the same is not being decided by the trial court. The Hon’ble Bench held that once a plea of non-maintainability of suit is taken by the party and particularly when a specific application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is moved seeking rejection of the plaint, it is a bounden duty of the civil court trying the suit to first advert to and decide the said application. The Court disposed of the petition directing the trial court to consider and decide the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC at the earliest and in any case not later than two months from the date copy of the order is received by the trial court.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/cmm_1_2021.pdf
CRM (M) 214/2019 Altaf Hussain Mufti v. Javed Choudhary Decided on: May 20, 2021 “What emerges from the aforesaid analysis it is deducible that both the elements i.e. mens rea and act us rea, sine qua non for constituting an offence of defamation are found missing in the article in question in its entirety. There has been neither any intent on the part of the petitioner to cause harm to the reputation of the complainant respondent herein nor is it discernible that any actual harm has been done to the reputation of complainantrespondent herein, more particularly in view of the fact that the complainant respondentherein has been found eligible for promotion as Principal GMC Srinagar by the government. The case of the petitioner indisputably can be said to fall within the above exceptions appended to section 499 IPC.”“As per the mandate of section 267 and 268 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now sections 227 and 228 of the Cr.P.C.), while considering the issue of framing of charge/discharge of the accused, the learned trial court has to form an opinion on the basis of material placed on record by the Investigating Officer as to whether there is sufficient ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence or not and the material on record would constitute the statement of witnesses, injury report/post-mortem report along with other material relied upon by the prosecution. At this stage, learned trial court cannot indulge in critical evolution of the evidence, that can be done at the time of final appreciation of evidence after the conclusion of the trial.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/CRM (M) 214_2019.pdf
CRR No. 27/2010 State of J&K and Anr v. Tanveer Ahmad Salah and Ors Decided on: May 19, 2021 A Single Bench of the Hon’ble High Court of J&K while deciding a revision petition preferred against the order passed by the Court of Learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Baramulla by virtue of which the respondents have been discharged for commission of offences under sections 302, 307 RPC and section 3 of the Public Properties (Prevention of Damages) Act and have been ordered to be charged for commission of offences under sections 304-A, 323, 336, 341, 427, 148 and 149 RPC ,observed that at the stage of considering the issue of framing of charge/discharge of the accused, the trial court should not conduct a mini trial and rather should form an opinion on the basis of material placed on record by the Investigating Officer as to whether there is sufficient ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence or not.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/CRR 27_2010.pdf
CRM(M) No. 146/2021 Zulfikar Hussain Dar v. Aijaz Ahmad DarDecided on: May 17, 2021 The Bench while reiterating the ingredients of Section 138 of the N.I. Act observed that neither at the time of taking cognizance of the complaint nor at the time of issuance of process the accused in required to be heard in the matter. The accused comes into picture only after the process for his appearance in the criminal complaint is issued and he appears before the Magistrate. Further, while holding that the stage of taking cognizance of an offence upon receiving a complaint precedes the examination of complainant and his witness under Section 200 Cr.P.C, the Court also delved into the true meaning of the word ‘cognizance’ and at what stage of proceedings the Magistrate is obliged to take it before proceeding further in the matter. It was observed, “cognizance’ in general meaning is said to be ‘knowledge’ or ‘notice’ and taking cognizance of offences means, ‘taking notice’ or ‘become aware of the alleged commission of offence’. The dictionary meaning of the word, ‘cognizance’ is ‘judicial hearing of a matter’. The term ‘cognizance of offence’ is nowhere defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure. Sections 190 to 199 of the Cr.P.C deal with method and the limitations, subject to which various Criminal Court sought to take cognizance of offences.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/CRM(M) No. 146_2021.pdf
Bail App. No. 139 of 2020 Badri Nath v. Union Territory of J&K Decided on: December 11, 2020 The presumption of guilt engrafted in sec 29 of POCSO Act gets triggered and applies only once trial begins, that is after charges are framed against the accused and not before that. But at the time of considering bail application of accused under sec 3, 5, 7 & 9 of POCSO Act, the presumption under sec 29 of the said Act would come into play at the pre-trial stage.It is necessary for all the Special Courts constituted under the POCSO Act within the Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh, to ensure that the victim/Child Welfare Committee is informed about the proceedings in bail petitions of the persons accused of having committed offences under the aforesaid Act by issuing prior notice to them.Rejection of bail application by an inferior court does not operate as a bar for the superior court in entertaining similar application on same facts and same offence.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/bail_app_139_2020.pdf
SLA No. 38 of 2018 State of J&K v. Mohd. Imran Khan Decided on: December 24, 2020 The High court directed all Courts of UT of J&K and Ladakh to avoid disclosing identity of rape survivors in their proceedings and judgments. The Court further issued directions to health professionals of UTs of J&K and Ladakh to desist from undertaking "two finger test" known as "per vaginal examination" on rape survivors. Proper measures should be taken to ensure the safety of rape survivors and no arbitrary or unlawful interference should be there with their privacy.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/sla_38_2018.pdf
CRM(M) 259 of 2019 Satpal Sharma v. Pawan Singh Rathore, Ex Vice Chairman, JDA Decided on: December 17, 2020 The order u/sec. 156(3) CrPC is an interlocutory order and no revision against the same lies. In an application under section 156(3) the suspect named in the application under section 156(3) does not have a right to be heard at the time of registration of a F.I.R.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/crm259_2019.pdf
Crl LP(D) 02/2020 Union of India, National Control Bureau v. Rafi Ahmad Decided on: December 15, 2020 The statement recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act without corroboration is sufficient to convict an accused, but for that, the court has to be satisfied about its voluntary nature. Confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of NDPS Act cannot be used as being barred under the provision of Section 25 of the Evidence Act.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/crl_lp_02_2020.pdf
CRMC No. 105 of 2018 Syed Zubair Shah & Ors. v. Farhat Rashid Sheikh Decided on: December 04, 2020 Once the cause of action for a particular relief is continuing, the application under Domestic Violence Act cannot be dismissed being time barred. Petition cannot be dismissed at the threshold on the issue of maintainability when there are disputed questions of facts, which require adjudication.
follow
/includes/Jud_Search/Judgement/crmc_105_2018.pdf
Notification regarding Instructions for smooth conduct of Higher Judicial ServiceExamination Scheduled on 18th and 19th of September 2021
follow
doc/upload/notices/noti_984_14092021.PDF
Anantnag
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/anantnag
Bandipora
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/bandipora
Baramullah
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/baramulla
Bhaderwah-Doda
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/doda
Budgam
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/badgam
Ganderbal
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/ganderbal
Jammu
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/jammu
Kargil
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/kargil
Kathua
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/kathua
Kishtwar
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/kishtwar
Kulgam
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/kulgam
Kupwara
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/kupwara
Leh
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/leh
Poonch
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/poonch
Pulwama
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/pulwama
Rajouri
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/rajouri
Ramban
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/ramban
Reasi
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/reasi
Samba
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/samba
Shopian
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/shopian
Srinagar
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/srinagar
Udhampur
follow
https://districts.ecourts.gov.in/udhampur